media development library

Audiences &
Users
Development &
Communication
Digital
Transformation
Media
Development
Religion &
Communication
Other
COUNTRIES
TOOLBOXES
SPECIAL COLLECTIONS

West & Central Africa
East & Southern Africa
Middle East & North Africa
Central & South Asia
East & Southeast Asia
Oceania & Pacific Islands
Western & Northern Europe
Eastern & Southeast Europe
Latin America
North America

Login
Register

Search database

Suggest new resources

Global Voices Advox

Filter

24

Breadcrumb: Global Voices Advox

Featured

Free Access

24

Topics

Digital Media Censorship, Control & Filtering, Internet & Social Media Censorship

22

Surveillance, Surveillance Technologies, Spyware

16

Authoritarian Regimes: Government Communication Strategies

13

Press Freedom & Communication Rights Violations

6

Government Communication Strategies

4

Data Governance, Data Justice, Data Sovereignty

2

Independent & Oppositional Media in Authoritarian Regimes

1

Cybersecurity, Digital Safety, Privacy, Right to Privacy

1

Facial Recognition, Biometric Surveillance

1

Disinformation, Misinformation, Fake News

1

Language

English

24

Document type

Country Reports, Country Studies

20

Position Papers, Policy Papers, Recommendations

1

Experiences & Case Studies

1

Countries

Morocco

2

Zimbabwe

2

India

2

Turkey

2

Egypt

2

Tanzania

2

Sudan

2

Brazil

2

Ecuador

2

Myanmar / Burma

2

Russia

2

Cameroon

1

Philippines

1

Kenya

1

Hungary

1

El Salvador

1

Venezuela

1

Kyrgyzstan

1

Kazakhstan

1

Hong Kong

1

Authors & Publishers

Boulay, Sofya du

1

Chimhangwa, Kudzai

1

Hamad, Khattab

1

Martins, Laís

1

Rotich, Chepkoech

1

Media focus

Digital, Mobile

24

General, Focus on Several Media Types

1

Publication Years

2020-2026

24

Methods applied

Comparative Analysis

1

Output Type

Non-Book Trade Publications, Reports, Working & Conference Papers

24

Sort by:

Direction:

Add to my commbox

The Unfreedom Monitor: Zimbabwe Country Report

Kudzai Chimhangwa

Amsterdam: Global Voices Advox (2022), 28 pp.

"The government of Zimbabwe and the ruling ZANU PF party are bent on ensuring that the status quo is preserved at all costs. As evidenced by findings in the Civic Media Observatory, the digital sphere has been identified as a threat to the country’s national security, insofar as deposing the curre ... nt political junta from power is concerned. The Arab Spring, which led to the deposing of leaders in the MENA region through social-media-organised protests certainly placed a lot of African governments on high alert about the potential transformative power of digital space. This has led to more governments, including that of Zimbabwe, enacting digitally repressive legislation aimed at curbing any form of political mobilisation on social media. Zimbabwe’s engagement with Russia, China, Iran and Israel for the acquisition of invasive spyware and biometric technology for mass surveillance purposes is premised on the ruling party’s overarching desire to control the population and retain political power. The fact that almost all deals are shrouded in a dark veil of secrecy bodes badly for civil society, human rights defenders, independent journalists, and opposition party members as the ends to which such technology will be applied are not publicised. The identification and tracking of journalists who expose corruption within government circles and their subsequent detention implies that digital technologies are being used as part of what Dragu and Lapu term preventive repression." (Analysis and conclusion, page 25) more

Add to my commbox

The Unfreedom Monitor: Turkey Country Report

Amsterdam: Global Voices Advox (2022), 27 pp.

"Since its ascent to power twenty years ago, the ruling AKP has tightened the screws on all forms of freedom of expression, both online and offline. It has introduced draconian laws, imposed internet restrictions, blocked content, and has arrested and intimidated critics on an unprecedented level. I ... n its toolbox are all three generations of information controls. The purges that took place in the aftermath of the failed military coup in 2016 have left the country in a state of continuous decline with thousands of civil servants jailed on bogus terrorism charges, media outlets shut, and an ongoing blocking of websites and targeting of social media platforms. The AKP continues to rely on the controversial Internet Bill, the Anti-terrorism Law, decreelaws, and an army of trolls, targeting critics and dissent online. The controversial app introduced by the National Police to snitch on social media accounts critical of the ruling party and its affiliates is yet another tool in the hands of the state to intimidate users and get in the way of freedom of speech online." (Analysis and conclusion, page 20) more

Add to my commbox

The Unfreedom Monitor: India Country Report

Amsterdam: Global Voices Advox (2022), 28 pp.

"India’s “techade” does show signs of digital authoritarianism that can potentially have farreaching implications for politics, civil liberties and society. At the same time, these are not new challenges for the country. In the past, the Indian government has attempted to surveil, monitor, and ... censor citizens. Here, state power is like water that will fall through any cracks and holes in the system. The system will either flourish or get contaminated based on the nature of the water. This report shows how COVID-19, protests, and major political incidents provide a ripe avenue for expanding state power. The larger socio-political context, one filled with concerns about a decline in democratic values, secularism, and civil liberties, will determine the extent of harm, who gets harmed, and the ability to respond. India’s lack of solid legal frameworks governing key technologies allows authorities to further exert power. As seen in the case of Aadhaar, facial recognition systems, and Aarogya Setu, legislative backing is an afterthought. However, by then, significant damage is already done. Any adverse impact on digital and civil rights will be felt most by vulnerable groups and those critical of the government. Besides the lack of legal structures, as seen through the report, the law is also used to expand state power. Further, as analysed in this report, private players supplying surveillance technologies, and social media giants enable digital authoritarianism in the country." (Analysis and conclusion, page 21) more

Add to my commbox

The Unfreedom Monitor: Egypt Country Report

Amsterdam: Global Voices Advox (2022), 20 pp.

"According to Reporters Without Borders (RSF), half of the media in the country is owned by the government or affiliated with the intelligence services. The rest are owned by pro-government businessmen. The few independent press websites that are still open have been blocked. Their owners and editor ... s were arrested and then released shortly after, as happened to Mada Masr and Al-Manassa. More than 500 websites have been blocked in Egypt, and more than 100 journalists have been arrested since 2014. The adoption of new regulations like the anti-terrorism law and cyber crime law and the creation of the Supreme Council for Media Regulation suppressed the freedom of expression and shut down the way to a free press. These new laws and regulations have affected the work of journalists who are at risk of charges such as belonging to a terrorist group or spreading false news. To the international community, Egypt denies imprisoning journalists for their work, which is true to some extent because Egyptian security is trying and imprisoning journalists on charges such as belonging to terrorist groups, without directly linking it to their journalistic work. The Airtable analysis undertaken in this project attempts to reflect the situation around monitoring technology through online content over the past few years. We can see a repeated goal of restricting the freedom of online spaces and banning any narrative parallel to the official one. This can be seen in the Attorney General's orders to establish a unit to monitor and monitor social media platforms and activities, contrary to constitutional articles that protect people's privacy and their right to freedom of expression." (https://advox.globalvoices.org) more

«
‹
1
2

Create your own commbox
Login

Home
Contact
Data privacy
Legal notice
FAQ
About
Sitemap

A Project by

commbox @ 2026