commbox Climate, Environment, Sustainable Development

Climate, Environment, Sustainable Development

Filter

565

Sort by:

Direction:

Climate Disinformation in Pakistan: Silencing Indigenous Peoples’ Voice

Humera Qasim Khan, Waqas Naeem

Islamabad: International Media Support (IMS); Institute for Research, Advocacy and Development (IRADA); Mediastan (2025), vii, 39 pp.

"The study identifies five distinct forms of climate disinformation in Pakistan: alarmist and sensationalised content, which exaggerates climate impact to provoke fear, confusion and emotional reactions rather than informed understanding; conspiracy-driven narratives that suggest hidden agendas or e ... xternal actors manipulating climate event, undermining trust in institutions and science; denial and delay narratives where scientific consensus is rejected or inaction is promoted by downplaying risks and questioning the urgency of climate response; oversimplified or false solutions that promote misleading or ineffective fixes to distract from evidence-based mitigation and adaptation strategies; religious fatalism, which frames climate change effects as predetermined or divinely inevitable, reducing perceived human responsibility and discouraging action.hich frames climate change effects as predetermined or divinely inevitable, reducing perceived human responsibility and discouraging action. The study also confirms findings from literature about structural weaknesses within Pakistan’s news media environment, which include a lack of consistent news coverage of climate issues, limited scientific literacy among journalists, editorial incentives favouring sensationalism over accuracy and the absence of systematic fact-checking protocols. These gaps, exacerbated by platform algorithms that reward virality over veracity, create a situation where climate-related disinformation may spread unchecked. The report shows that the climate disinformation impacts IPs in five ways: first, it affects community safety and Indigenous livelihoods by creating a false sense of security or conversely unnecessary panic among IP communities that may lead to damage, displacement and poor adaptation and mitigation practices; second, disinformation related to natural disasters generates fear, uncertainty, confusion and psychological distress among vulnerable IP communities, creating emotional trauma and diminishing their self-confidence in their ability to respond to climate risks; third, climate-related disinformation erodes trust of IPs in scientific forecasts, institutional information and the official responses of state authorities, as viral disinformation messages and rumours fill the information vacuum created by the absence of clear, timely and accessible climate communication; fourth, it discourages Indigenous ecological knowledge and diminishes the credibility of local adaptation methods by painting these methods as primitive, unscientific or outdated; fifth, climate disinformation intensifies the existing exclusion, marginalisation and invisibility of IPs in climate policy frameworks and climate governance mechanisms, silencing their voices and forcibly transforming them from custodians of community resilience to subjects of pity or blame within the policy and media discourses. The study underscores that climate disinformation is not an isolated digital problem but a systemic governance challenge. It undermines trust in science and institutions, weakens public engagement and delays adaptation efforts. This crisis of information integrity demands coordinated action across sectors. The report offers the following recommendations for key stakeholders to address climate disinformation and its impact on Indigenous peoples and communities in Pakistan. UN bodies should support the government in integrating climate information integrity in national climate and digital governance frameworks and ensure Pakistan’s compliance with relevant international conventions and declarations on the rights of Indigenous Peoples. The relevant ministries of the federal and provincial governments should embed information integrity into Pakistan’s climate governance frameworks, including the National Action Plan and Nationally Determined Contributions, to ensure coordinated and accountable action on climate misinformation. iNGOs should facilitate the creation of a National Climate Fact-Checking Alliance linking journalists, researchers, media organisations and civil society for real-time verification and rapid debunking of false climate narratives. CSOs should establish community-based verification networks, conduct grassroots awareness campaigns, promote digital safety and information verification capacity building for IPs and document and amplify local climate knowledge. Media should set up climate news beats within newsrooms, ensure the presence of trained journalists for environmental reporting, institutionalise fact-checking protocols, provide training for journalists on climate science and disaster reporting and adopt ethical editorial standards for coverage of climate emergencies. Technology companies should implement algorithmic accountability measures to curb the viral spread of climate disinformation, promote verified climate information through priority ranking and contextual labels, collaborate with fact-checkers to monitor regional-language climate content for falsehoods and support rapid-response climate information alerts for Pakistan during climate-induced extreme weather events. Indigenous communities should engage in peer-led digital literacy programmes that build capacity to recognise and counter climate disinformation and collaborate with independent media to document." (Executive summary, pages vi-vii) more

Download (45)

The Alternative Truth Kept Hidden From Us: The Effects of Multimodal Disinformation Disseminated by Ordinary Citizens and Alternative Hyper-Partisan Media. Evidence From the US and India

Michael Hameleers, Darian Harff, Désirée Schmuck

Digital Journalism, volume 13, issue 8 (2025), pp. 1351-1372

"The affordances of social media potentially amplify the effects of disinformation by offering the possibility to present deceptive content and sources in credible and native ways. We investigate the effects of two aspects related to the dissemination and modality of digital disinformation: (In)auth ... more

External Link (102)

Climate Disinformation in Thailand: Negating Indigenous Peoples’ Identity

Bangkog: Asia Centre (2025), viii, 60 pp.

"This report examines how climate disinformation reinforces the systemic negation of Indigenous People's (IP) identity, undermining traditional practices, weakening advocacy for rights and obstructing inclusive climate and forest governance by making three key contributions. First, it identifies fou ... r distinct forms of climate disinformation in Thailand: one-sided reporting, where the media spotlights government and corporate initiatives while omitting their social and environmental harms, whether due to political pressure or economic incentives; greenwashing, where corporations exaggerate or misrepresent their sustainability practices to obscure their ongoing environmentally destructive activities; false climate solutions promoted as climate action which fails to address the root causes of climate change while leaving IP communities socially and economically disadvantaged; scapegoating of IPs where Indigenous communities are falsely portrayed as primary drivers of deforestation, legitimising displacement and marginalisation. Second, it demonstrates four ways in which climate disinformation harms IPs, each reinforcing the negation of their identities: exclusion from decision-making: by either barring their participation outright or dismissing their inputs in decision-making processes, IPs’ Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) is removed thereby negating their identities as owners and stewards of their land; criminalisation: the strategic misuse of “climate change” laws to negate IP identity and erase the legitimacy of IPs’ traditions and practices in environmental stewardship; and the use of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) intimidate advocates for challenging climate disinformation; forced evictions: conservation and development narratives justify deterritorialisation that severs spiritual, cultural and economic ties to ancestral lands which forms the core of IPs’ identities; intimidation and violence: harassment, threats and attacks undermining the capacity of IPs to resist projects and actions that harm them, their environment and their way of life. Third, to address climate disinformation and safeguard Indigenous Peoples’ (IPs) rights and identities in Thailand, this report outlines a list of multi-stakeholder recommendations: UN bodies should integrate climate disinformation into their human rights monitoring and climate action frameworks and provide guidance to Thailand on implementing its international obligations; the Thai government should embed safeguards against climate disinformation into national climate and environmental policies, strengthen legal protections for IPs, ensure meaningful participation of IP communities in decision-making and improve transparency and accountability in environmental governance; international NGOs (INGOs) should collaborate with IP organisations to map, document and respond to climate disinformation, provide sustained technical capacity-building and funding, and support advocacy and litigation to defend IP rights; civil society organisations (CSOs) should monitor disinformation targeting IPs, co-develop counter-narratives with IP communities and educational content to empower both IPs and the broader public and expand legal aid support; the media sector should prioritise constructive and investigative journalism on climate, environmental, and IP issues; expand coverage in Indigenous languages and culturally appropriate formats; collaborate with IP organisations on fact-checking and monitoring disinformation; and amplify Indigenous perspectives through both national and international outlets; technology companies should strengthen content moderation against climate disinformation, flag misleading project information and invest in digital literacy and connectivity initiatives for rural and Indigenous communities; indigenous communities and organisations should build monitoring networks to identify and counter disinformation, strengthen alliances with independent and Indigenous media, conduct and participate in capacity-building workshops and use digital tools to amplify their voices and safeguard knowledge." (Executive summary, pages vi-vii) more

Download (25)

Communicating a World-in-Crisis

Simon Cottle (eds.)

New York: Peter Lang (2025), xiv, 391 pp.

"We live in a world increasingly defined by systemic, deepening and compounding crises. They threaten not only future human existence but also the planetary web-of-life. With the help of academics, creative practitioners and activists, this book explores some of the innovative ways in which differen ... more

External Link (93)

Google Scholar (92)

WorldCat (82)

Attracting Volunteers Through Social Media Marketing in Environmental Organizations

Ali Çetinkaya, Yusuf Bilgin, Kübra Elmalı

Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing (2025), 31 pp.

"Nowadays, environmental organizations have strategically leveraged social media platforms to raise environmental awareness, promote pro-environmental behavior, manage environmental campaigns, and encourage environmental volunteerism. This study aims to investigate the impact of social media marketi ... more

Download (21)

The psychology of collective climate action: Building climate courage

Karen Hamann, Eva Junge, Paula Blumenschein, Sophia Dasch, Alex Wernke, Julian Bleh

Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge (2025), xxv, 218 pp.

"How do we find the courage to act together against the climate crisis? This book weaves together real-life findings and examples from the social-ecological movement with psychological research to show how motivation for collective climate action can be built. The book addresses two key questions: h ... more

Download (22)

Environmental Humanities in India

Debajyoti Biswas, John Ryan (eds.)

Singapore: Springer (2025), x, 234 pp.

"This open access book offers an introduction to the field of the environmental humanities in India. The environmental humanities, often referred to as ‘EH’, are a multifaceted, relatively new, and swiftly evolving field of scholarship that integrates the theories and approaches of various disci ... more

Download (8)

Communicating Science, Climate Change and the Environment in Hybrid Media: Constructed Facts, Contested Truths

Mette Marie Roslyng, Anna Rantasila, Anna Maria Jönsson (eds.)

Oxford: Routledge (2025), xiii, 243 pp.

"This volume examines how a new hybrid mediascape represents and contributes to the construction of facts and knowledge in relation to science, environment, and climate controversies, providing a new, critical perspective to the bourgeoning field of science and environment communication. Arguing tha ... more

External Link (56)

Google Scholar (67)

WorldCat (56)

Media and Communication Systems for Sustainability in Nigeria

Nelson Okorie, Oluyinka Osunkunle, Kehinde Oyesomi (eds.)

Cham: Palgrave Macmillan (2025), xxix, 541 pp.

"The aim of this book is to advance a research agenda on the potential role of media in promoting the UN Sustainable Development Goals in Nigeria. It provides a theoretical and empirical framework for explicating the potential place of media structures and institutions in tackling issues affecting s ... more

External Link (93)

Climate Disinformation in India: Subverting Indigenous Peoples’ Identity

Bangkog: Asia Centre (2025), viii, 55 pp.

"The report makes three key contributions: it identifies the main forms of climate disinformation in India, examines their specific impacts on indigenous peoples (IP) communities and sets out targeted policy recommendations for national and international stakeholders. First, four forms of climate di ... sinformation circulating in the media landscape in India are identified: one-sided coverage, where the media circulate disinformation by the state, by highlighting false ecological progress while omitting data on biodiversity loss, environmental impacts and displacement; promoting false climate solutions, like afforestation and green credit programmes, which are dubbed as climate action despite their harmful ecological impacts and effects on IPs; attributing environmental disasters to climate change, where state authorities deflect accountability for disasters arising from governance failures and poor infrastructure to climate change; denialism of climate change and its causes, which relies on the suppression of scientific data, promotion of anti-renewable myths and the institutional erasure of climate-linked mortality, thereby sowing doubt and enabling the deflection of accountability. Second, the report shows that the deliberate circulation of climate disinformation in the media subverts IPs’ rights and legal safeguards in favour of state and corporate interests in five critical ways: bypassing IPs’ rights to Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) by deliberately spreading distorted information effectively marginalising IP voices from environmental decision-making; restricting traditional practices by promoting false state initiatives while claiming environmental legitimacy, thereby worsening climate adaptation and livelihoods; undermining IPs’ forest conservation efforts, through the reframing of unsustainable top-down conservation efforts as climate action, thus enabling the loss of biocultural diversity; forced evictions and deterritorialisation, often enabled by the misrepresentation of environmental data in judicial rulings under the guise of ecological progress; legal persecution, Intimidation and physical violence, where IPs and environmental defenders are subjected to both online harassment and militarised control in order to suppress resistance to state or corporate projects. Third, this report outlines a set of recommendations for action: United Nations (UN) bodies should conduct an audit of India's compliance with IPs’ rights, investigate how state and corporate disinformation facilitates violations and support the ratification of relevant international laws and conventions; the government should strengthen legal safeguards for IPs by providing greater technical and administrative support to effectively implement the Forest Rights Act, ensuring robust FPIC protocols in all climate and development projects; international non-governmental organisations (INGOs) should support Indigenous-led audits of government programmes, submit evidence of digital surveillance to UN bodies, and help establish rapid-response legal networks and community fact-checking hubs in IP languages; civil society organisations (CSOs) should establish a national database for eco-development displacements, offer mobile legal clinics for land rights and advocate for policies requiring IPs’ representation in environmental bodies; the media sector should expose data manipulation in official forest reports, establish Indigenous-language fact-checking and leverage public broadcasting to boost digital literacy and amplify community voices; technology companies should develop tools to detect disinformation targeting IPs, conduct transparent audits of algorithmic bias on their platforms and partner with CSOs to provide digital literacy and secure communication tools; IP communities should continue to document land-use violations using community mapping, file collective petitions to audit projects violating their rights and build alliances to establish Indigenous-owned media platforms to control narratives." (Executive summary, pages vi-vii) more

Download (34)

The Journalism in Climate Change Websites: Their Distinct Forms of Specialism, Content, and Role Perceptions

James Painter, Jarkko Kangas, Risto Kunelius, Adrienne Russell

Journalism Practice, volume 18, issue 4 (2024), pp. 954-973

"Survey results from news consumers around the world suggest that specialist or niche websites covering climate change are now one of the most important sources of climate information. However, there is very little detailed scholarship about these sites. We carried out semi-structured interviews wit ... more

Download (49)

Press and planet in danger: Safety of environmental journalists – trends, challenges and recommendations

Kristjan Burgess, John-Bosco Maylga, Nadia Anna Mandl

Paris: UNESCO (2024), 18 pp.

"At least 749 journalists, groups of journalists, and news media outlets reporting on environmental issues have been attacked in 89 countries between 2009 and 2023, in all regions of the world. Over 300 attacks occurred in the past five years, marking a 42% increase from the preceding five-year peri ... more

Download (25)

Mapping Climate Disinformation Ecosystem in Croatia and Slovenia

Mato Brautovic

Dubrovnik: Adria Digital Media Observatory (2024), 10 pp.

Download (19)

Educomunicación para la preservación de la Amazonía: Estudio de caso Grupo Comunicarte, Colombia

Sara López-Gómez

Revista Española de Desarrollo y Cooperación, volume 51, issue 2 (2024), pp. 263-276

"La región amazónica enfrenta múltiples desafíos ambientales, socioeconómicos y humanitarios debido a la deforestación, minería ilegal y conflicto armado, afectando especialmente a comunidades indígenas y afrodescendientes. Este estudio de caso utiliza análisi ... more

Download (28)

Vulnerable voices: Using topic modeling to analyze newspaper coverage of climate change in 26 non-Annex I countries (2010–2020)

Lucy Mc Allister, Vedula Siddharth Vedula, Wenxi Pu, Maxwell Boykoff

Environmental Research Letters, volume 19, issue 24046 (2024), 13 pp.

"News media influence how climate change is represented, understood, and discussed in the public sphere. To date, media and climate change research has primarily focused on Annex I countries, or treated non-Annex I countries as a homogenous bloc, despite the global nature of climate change and its g ... more

Download (8)

ABC de las COPs: Todo sobre la Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático y la relevancia de la COP30 en la Amazonía

Brasilia: Rede Eclesial Pan-Amazônica - REPAM Brasil (2024), 52 pp.

"Este material es un puente. Es una invitación para que el conocimiento salga de las oficinas y conferencias y llegue a los territorios y comunidades indígenas y tradicionales de la Amazonía. Aquí encontrarás explicaciones sencillas de los principales temas tratados en la COP30, presentadas de ... more

Download (43)

Understanding climate change conspiracy beliefs: A comparative outlook

Daniel Stockemer, Jean-Nicolas Bordeleau

Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, volume 5, issue 6 (2024), 12 pp.

"Are climate change conspiracy theories widespread across the world, or do we find climate change conspiracy beliefs more so in some countries than in others? This research note explores the prevalence of conspiracy beliefs that identify climate change as a hoax across eight geographically and cultu ... more

Download (34)

Ecogames: Playful Perspectives on the Climate Crisis
Deep Insights

Laura op de Beke, Joost Raessens, Stefan Werning, Gerald Farca (eds.)

Oxford: Amsterdam University Press (2024), 612 pp.

"With the climate crisis and its repercussions becoming more and more tangible, games are increasingly participating in the production, circulation, and interrogation of environmental assumptions, using both explicit and implicit ways of framing the crisis. Whether they are providing new spaces to i ... more

Download (46)

Metastudie "Nachhaltigkeitseffekte der Digitalisierung": Eine Auswertung aktueller Studien zur (quantitativen) Bemessung der Umwelteffekte durch die Digitalisierung

Jan Stede, Christian Lautermann et al.

Berlin: Technopolis; Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung (2024), ix, 96 pp.

"In dieser Studie werden auf Basis der Literaturanalyse eine Vielzahl an Anwendungsfällen mit besonders hohen Potenzialen für positive Umwelteffekte identifiziert. Insbesondere im Energiebereich gibt es eine Vielzahl von vergleichsweise gut erforschten Anwendungsfällen. Hierzu zählt beispielswei ... se der Einsatz von Smart Metering und preisdynamischen Tarifen. Auch Automatisierung und Monitoring im Gebäudebereich können den Energieverbrauch deutlich verringern. Durch Digitalisierung im Energiesektor kann außerdem das Abregeln erneuerbarer Energien vermieden werden. Im Bereich Verkehr können Technologien wie Internet of Things (IoT) und 5G z. B. die THG-Emissionen im Güterverkehr deutlich senken. Die positiven Umweltpotenziale der Digitalisierung sind jedoch nicht auf das Einsparen von CO2-Emissionen beschränkt. In der Landwirtschaft können z. B. durch den Einsatz von Precision Farming durch digital gestütztes Monitoring der Einsatz von Pflanzenschutzmitteln und Bewässerung reduziert werden. Trotz einer Vielzahl von Studien, die sich mit Umwelteffekten von Digitalisierung beschäftigen, ist der Wissensstand über das Ausmaß der Potenziale in vielen Bereichen jedoch immer noch lückenhaft. In den für diese Studie analysierten Veröffentlichungen wird eine Vielzahl von digitalen Technologien und Anwendungsfällen qualitativ bzw. anekdotisch als sehr relevant beschrieben, es fehlen jedoch in der Regel Quantifizierungen. Obwohl z. B. für den Bereich KI viele Veröffentlichungen identifiziert wurden, enthielten nur wenige quantifizierte Analysen, auch Bilanzierungen fehlten zum Teil. Diese Studien wurden daher nur begrenzt in die Metastudie miteinbezogen, deuten aber auf ein potenziell disruptives Potenzial von KI in manchen Anwendungsbereichen hin (z. B. im Bereich Klimaanpassung kann KI durch die Verbesserung von Prognosen die Reaktionsfähigkeit auf Umweltereignisse erhöhen). Mit der Digitalisierung gehen neben Umweltchancen auch negative Umwelteffekte einher. Zu den negativen Effekten der Digitalisierung gehören direkte Effekte, die durch den Energie- und Ressourcenverbrauch der Produktion und den Betrieb digitaler Infrastruktur entstehen. Ein weiteres prominentes Beispiel sind negative systemische Effekte wie Rebound-Effekte. Daher führt Digitalisierung nicht zwangsläufig zu einer Verringerung des Ressourcenverbrauchs. Positive Umwelteffekte der Digitalisierung gehen oft auf positive Enabling-Effekte wie Optimierungs- und Substitutionseffekte zurück, oder ergeben sich durch den Wandel zu nachhaltigen Verhaltens- und Konsummustern. Im Fokus der Literatur stehen meist positive Enabling-Effekte. Die vorhandenen Quantifizierungen konzentrieren sich meist auf die Potenziale digitaler Technologien (die positiven Enabling-Effekte). Nur in wenigen Studien werden vor- und nachgelagerte Umwelteffekte der Produktion der digitalen Technologien sowie weitere systemische Effekte wie Rebound-Effekte in die Umweltbewertung mit einbezogen. Eine übergeordnete Bewertung der Gesamtbilanz digitaler Technologien im Rahmen wissenschaftlicher Analysen wird somit erschwert. Bei vielen Studien handelt es sich zudem um Fallstudien, die Umwelteffekte unter sehr spezifischen Rahmenbedingungen ermitteln. Es ist daher häufig nicht klar, inwieweit sich diese Potenziale skalieren bzw. auf andere Kontexte übertragen lassen. Schließlich werden Umweltauswirkungen häufig auf CO2-Äq. verkürzt und auf eine breitere Betrachtung von Umwelteffekten im Sinne von Ressourcenverbrauch wird oft verzichtet." (Zusammenfassung, Seite 7-8) more

Download (26)

Climate and Environmental Journalism under Fire: Threats to Free and Independent Coverage of Climate Change and Environmental Degradation

Barbara Trionfi

International Press Institute (IPI) (2024), 59 pp.

Ecogames: Playful Perspectives on the Climate Crisis Deep Insights

Ecogames: Playful Perspectives on the Climate Crisis
Deep Insights