"The study revealed the macro and micro media threats that come to light in the digital and physical media environments prior to and following elections. The media environment observed during the 2021 self-government elections was representative of the reality seen through the eyes of media workers, and it was revealed that, compared to previous years, the media environment has changed for the worse. The study confirmed that political polarization and public crises have a negative impact on the media environment and the safety of journalists in Georgia, while changes in the political landscape can have a positive impact on the media environment. It has also been demonstrated that the media themselves can reduce or enhance the effects of polarization.
The study confirmed that media threats in Georgia increase self-censorship and fear, reduce media credibility and weaken the viability of the media institution. The study revealed an additional effect of political polarization, a new tactic to combat critical media: “Use the media themselves against the journalists”, which leads to media polarization in itself, inciting conflict between journalists and exposing this macro-threat across the media field. In this regard, polarization in Georgia is an obstacle to solidarity. On the other hand, polarization has a so-called demonizing effect that can be manifested through the stigmatization of journalists by politicians, political labelling, and demolition of credibility, which ultimately harms the media.
The research confirmed that the ruling political force in Georgia uses all the components and mechanisms required to create and strengthen self-censorship of journalists. These mechanisms are: fear, impunity for crime, ridicule, discrediting, insecurity, dissemination of misinformation, etc. Enhancing journalists' self-censorship creates an invisible field of censorship in newsrooms when, for security reasons, the journalist is forced to avoid covering specific topics, sources, or facts. Critical questions are replaced by silence." (Conclusion, pages 51-52)
"This research was triggered by the actualisation of the acute and, in some ways, spontaneous media threat that arose during the pre-election period. More specifically, on 5 July 2021, two months before Georgia’s local self-government municipal elections, media workers fell victim to a premeditated attack by pro-Russian radical groups during the coverage of demonstrations. As a result, 53 journalists from more than 10 media sources, a cameraman and a photographer were assaulted and a TV Pirveli cameraman, Lekso Lashkarava, died a few days later as a result of heavy injuries received during the demonstration. Challenges seen from the perspective of the safety of journalists garnered an unprecedented level of international attention and stimulated research in the field." (CFOM)
1 LITERATURE REVIEW 7
International Perspective on Media Threats -- Media Environment and Polarization -- Self-Censorship and Fear 14 -- Pre-Election Media Threats Outline in Georgia
2 RESEARCH DESIGN, METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURES 22
3 INTEGRATED ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 24
Polarization as a Media Threat -- Interference with Journalistic Activities -- Physical and Verbal Violence Against Journalists -- Russian Model in Media as a Macro-Threat -- Supportive Environment and Solidarity -- Safe Media Environment: Education and Research Focus
CONCLUSION, 51
RECOMMENDATIONS, 54