"Redefining the concept of new media in China, this cutting edge book discusses the impact of social media on Chinese public life. Examining its characteristics and the different forms of social media, such as internet and mobile phone media, weibo, wechat and micro-blogging, it considers how public opinion evolves through this media and its interaction with traditional media. It also offers a unique analysis of growing new media platforms, the challenges of government management and the impact of micro-blogging on journalism in China. Through quantitative research, the book also analyses new media user behavior in China, offering a 'butterfly effect' model for public opinion based on new media. It also shows the relevance of the sociological Matthew Effect and addresses issues such as the '20 million' phenomenon and the Internet Water army (Wangluo shuijun), groups of Internet ghost-writers paid to post specific content online. Finally, it scrutinizes the issue of mass disturbance in new media in China, researching evolutionary mechanisms and academic models of mass disturbance through a series of case studies." (Publisher description)
PART I: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF NEW MEDIA'S PUBLIC OPINIONS
1 An Introduction to New Media, 3
2 New-Media Public Opinion Becomes Mainstream Social Opinion, 25
3 Theoretical Models for Studying New-Media Public Opinion, 39
PART II: STUDY OF THE MAIN BODY OF NEW-MEDIA PUBLIC OPINION-USERS
4 Study of the Characteristics of New-Media Users, 87
PART III: STUDY OF THE OBJECTS OF NEW-MEDIA PUBLIC OPINION-PLATFORMS
5 Network Forums, 101
6 Blogs and Microblogging, 123
7 Mobile Phone Media and Its Public Opinion Management, 175
PART IV: HOT TOPICS OF STUDIES OF NEW-MEDIA'S PUBLIC OPINIONS
8 Studies of New Media's Rumors, 211
9 New-Media's Public Opinions of the Mass Incident, 225
PART V: EMPIRICAL STUDIES
10 Empirical Studies on New-Media Public Opinion, 257
PART VI: COUNTERMEASURES AND PROSPECTS
11 Countermeasures Against New-Media Public Opinion, 265
12 Future Prospects of New-Media Public Opinion, 277