"Systemic evaluation design continuously addresses six questions: 1. What are the intervention purposes? 2. What is the scope and focus of the intervention and evaluation? 3. What ought to be the consequences of the evaluation and what evaluation purposes promote those consequences? 4. What are the criteria (or values) that should underpin the judgment of merit, worth and significance? 5. What questions inform the collection of data so that judgments can be made using those criteria? 6. How can the evaluation be feasible? A systemic approach can be summarised as: understanding inter-relationships, engaging with multiple perspectives and reflecting on boundary choices. Systemic evaluation design flows from three key principles: 1. Systemic evaluation design is a process and a product. Evaluation design is a process that occurs throughout the evaluation, not just a product of the first stage of an evaluation. 2. Systemic evaluation design focuses on consequences. And by that I mean the consequences of the evaluation. Some might call it outcomes. 3. Systemic evaluation design emphasises what to leave out rather than what to put in. It is not possible to include everything that happened in the intervention, nor possible to include every single perspective or viewpoint or framing of the intervention." (Page ii)