"Piers Robinson revisits the debates over what has been called the "CNN effect," a term that assumes media coverage of crises invariably leads to instigating humanitarian responses. While many claimed that interventions during humanitarian crises were influenced by media reporting of suffering people, early research indicated that influence was more conditional and dependent upon factors such as policy uncertainty, the political risks, and costs associated with the intervention. Since 9/11, the emergence of the "war on terror" has seen humanitarianism exploited in order to justify invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and the co-optation of humanitarian organizations as part of winning "hearts and minds." Even though new communication technologies appear to offer the potential for more effective humanitarian responses, the overall space for genuine humanitarian action would appear to have shrunk by the use of it for manipulative organized persuasive communication (propaganda) purposes in the context of the "war on terror" and the aggressive pursuit of perceived Western interests." (Introduction to part 9, page 502-503)