Document details

Venezuela: Calculated Repression. Correlation Between Stigmatization and Politically Motivated Arbitrary Detentions

Amnesty International;Foro Penal;Centro para los Defensores y la Justicia (CDJ) (2022), 54 pp.

CC BY-NC-ND

Other editions: also published in Spanish

"In 2011, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders defined stigmatization as the characterization of human rights defenders as “terrorists”, “enemies of the State” or “political opponents” by state authorities and state media and its use to delegitimize their work, increasing their vulnerability to human rights abuses and violations. The CDJ has recorded acts of stigmatization against human rights defenders between January 2019 and June 2021 in Venezuela, through public and private media outlets with links to the government. Often these media outlets, which may take the form of web portals, television programmes and blogs, among others, use the spaces to attack, expose and harass people who are perceived as critical of the government of Nicolás Maduro. Upon analysing the database with more than 300 acts of stigmatization between January 2019 and June 2021, the media outlets whose content was most frequently repeated ahead of detentions by Venezuelan security forces were Con el Mazo Dando, Misión Verdad and the web portal Lechuguinos [...] The correlation between politically motivated arbitrary detentions, carried out by all state security agents, and stigmatization, carried out by all sources of stigmatization, was filtered by each year analysed due to the different nature of each period. From this analysis it was shown that while in 2019 the overall correlation between both variables was 29%, in 2020 it increased to 42% and in the first half of 2021 it reached 77%. The annual correlations between arbitrary detentions and stigmatization also varied depending on the different security forces involved in the detention. Thus, there is a closer correlation in 2019 with detentions occurring by intelligence agencies (DGCIM and SEBIN), in 2020 by bodies under the PNB, including the FAES, which rises to 92%, and in 2021 by bodies of a civilian and decentralized nature, such as the FAES, municipal police forces and the Scientific, Penal and Criminal Investigation Corps (CICPC) which also rises to 92% correlation with stigmatization." (Executive summary, page 6-7)
Executive summary, 6
1 INTRODUCTION, 11
2 METHODOLOGY, 12
3 CALCULATING REPRESSION, 15
Stigmatization of human rights defenders, 15
Politically motivated arbitrary detentions in Venezuela, 23
Correlation between stigmatization and arbitrary detentions, 33
Correlation between stigmatization and the security forces that carry out detentions, 35
Relationship between sources of stigmatization and the courts, 41
Other patterns of correlation in specific periods, 46
Conclusions on patterns of correlation between stigmatization and arbitrary detention in Venezuela, 50
Patterns of stigmatization as a sign of political persecution, 51
Depriving a specific group of people of their fundamental rights, 52
Politically motivated discrimination, 53
4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 54