Filter
13
Featured
Free Access
13
Inspiring Practice
1
Key Guidance
1
Topics
Chilling Effects (Discouragement of Legitimate Exercise of Legal Rights)
2
Defamation Law & Regulation
2
Freedom of Expression
1
Freedom of Expression Lobbying & Communication Rights Campaigning
1
Censorship
1
Press Freedom & Communication Rights Violations
1
Countering Press Freedom Violations by Legal Actions
1
Media Freedom, Press Freedom
1
Trauma: Media Representation & Reporting
1
Disaster & Humanitarian Crisis Reporting
1
Countering Defamation & Harassment
1
Media Law & Regulation: International Standards & Practices
1
Investigative Journalism
1
Journalism Education & Training
1
Journalists Dealing with Risks & Threats, Resilience & Wellbeing of Media Workers
1
Corruption Reporting & Role of Media in Curbing Corruption
1
Court Reporting & Media Representation of Judicial System
1
Death & Grief: Reporting & Media Representation
1
Media Law & Regulation
1
Resilience
1
Language
Document type
Countries / Regions
Authors & Publishers
Media focus
Publication Years
Output Type
Journalism as the Fourth Emergency Service: Trauma and Resilience
Inspiring Practice
New York et al.: Peter Lang (2024), xviii, 257 pp.
"Journalists have often been considered the "fourth emergency service". They are first on the scene, alongside paramedics, fi re and police, running towards danger rather than away, and providing independent, veritable and crucial information in the public interest. And yet, unlike frontline workers
...
CASE handbook: How to prevent SLAPPs or get help if it's too late
Coalition Against SLAPPs in Europe (CASE) (2024), 31 pp.
SLAPPs: A Threat to Democracy Continues to Grow. A 2023 Report Update
Coalition Against SLAPPs in Europe (CASE);Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation, 2nd ed. (2023), 23 pp.
How Are Courts Responding to SLAPPs? Analysis of Selected Court Decisions from Across the Globe
Columbia University Global Freedom of Expression (2023), 26 pp.
The "misuse" of the judicial system to attack freedom of expression: Trends, challenges and responses
Paris: UNESCO (2022), 16 pp.
"The gradual trend toward the decriminalization of defamation is slowing down, with 160 states still not having decriminalized defamation. The use of criminal defamation offences to restrict online expression has increased worldwide. Several States have harshened or reintroduced provisions on libel,
...
SLAPPs against journalists across Europe
Article 19;Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) (2022), 86 pp.
"This report provides a Europe-wide overview of lawsuits that are taken to stifle scrutiny and public debate on issues such as corruption, mismanagement of public resources, and human rights violations. Such lawsuits, known as strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) are taken by pow
...
Fighting SLAPPs: What Can Media, Lawyers, and Funders Do?
Washington, DC: Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA) (2022), 16 pp.
"Strategic lawsuits against public participation, or SLAPPs, are lawsuits taken against media organizations or activists with the sole purpose of silencing them. They typically involve a huge disparity in resources and the claimant’s tactic is to use the lawsuit, or threat of a lawsuit, to divert
...
Demandas judiciales como esquema de intimidación y censura periodística en el combate a la corrupción
Iniciativa Sinaloa (2021), 46 pp.
Protecting Public Watchdogs Across the EU: A Proposal for an EU Anti-SLAPP Law
Key Guidance
Article 19;Civil Liberties Union for Europe;Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ);et al. (2020), 48 pp.
"Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) are a form of legal harassment. Pursued by law firms on behalf of powerful individuals and organisations who seek to avoid public scrutiny, their aim is to drain the target’s financial and psychological resources and chill critical voices t
...
An Activist's Guide: Reducing Exposure to SLAPP Lawsuits
Protect the Protest (2019), 17 pp.
Libel Tourism: Silencing the Press Through Transnational Legal Threats
Washington, DC: Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA) (2010), 41 pp.
"This report by Drew Sullivan, a journalist, editor, and media development specialist, explains how lawsuits can force media organizations to censor themselves or limit the distribution of their news content, restricting freedom of expression and thus threatening one of the foundations of democracy.
...
