"The study found that the media often framed REDD+ in political and economic terms, at the expense of, for example, ecological concerns or discussions of the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation. Issues associated with carbon trading were a frequent topic of media articles, with many stories focusing on the activities and antics of so- called ‘carbon cowboys’. Governance issues, including allegations of corruption and impropriety levelled against the Office of Climate Change also featured prominently. International policy debates were also common topics covered by the media, including the annual conference of the parties (COP) to the UNFCCC, international funding for REDD+, and Papua New Guinea’s leadership role in promoting REDD+ internationally The 160 newspaper articles (and 213 frames) that covered REDD+ in depth (as opposed to only mentioning REDD+ in passing) featured a total of 183 advocates and 21 adversaries. The analysis reveals that national government actors were the dominant voices in the REDD+ debate in Papua New Guinea." (Executive summary)