"The evaluations point to several dimensions of the strategic significance of joint work. Programmatically, joint programmes enable a more multidimensional and holistic approach to addressing gender inequality. They enhance the catalytic role of the UN by increasing the visibility of and advocacy on gender issues in national and global agendas. Normatively, they forge new partnerships for gender equality and combine the comparative advantages of multiple agencies in technical expertise and stakeholder networks. Operationally, they can enhance the effectiveness of intervention implementation by reducing duplication of efforts and ensuring a more efficient use of resources across UN agencies, although typically with a sizable increase in transaction costs in terms of human labour for coordination and communication for technical coherence and governance structures such as steering committees. The results of programming were typically measured in outputs rather than outcomes or impact, though inter-agency programmes for SDG 5 reported considerable accomplishments in multisectoral reach to beneficiaries and knowledge production." (Page 1)
1 BACKGROUND, 9
2 METHODOLOGY 11
3 EVALUATION MAPPING. 13
4 RESULTS 16
4.1 What’s working and not working in inter-agency programming for gender equality, 10
4.2 Enabling and hindering factors for inter-agency programming, 15
4.3 Recurring recommendations to strengthen inter-agency programming, 16
4.4 Evidence gaps, 18
4.5 Lessons learned, 19
5 THE WAY FORWARD, 27
Annex: List of included evaluation reports, 24