Document details

Changing Norms is Key to Fighting Everyday Corruption

Washington, DC: World Bank, Communication for Governance and Accountability Program (CommGAP) (2011), 25, 55 pp.

CC BY

"Based on CommGAP’s interactions with the global anticorruption community as well as earlier research, we were able to collate 18 representative instances (case studies) from around the world, with real-life examples of citizens coming together to speak up against corruption and social norms vis-à-vis corruption or to change public services affected by corrupt practices. This report is a “one-step-up” analysis of the collated case studies, which is intended to shed light on practical approaches, tools, and techniques that have been successful in bringing citizens together to stand against the daunting phenomenon of corruption." (Page 1)
ANALYSIS OF THE CASE STUDIES, 1
Established Norms -- Instigating Factors Provoking Bottom-up Interventions -- Objectives/Strategies for Action -- Tools and Techniques Used -- Outcomes/Impact of the Interventions
CONCLUSION/DIRECTION FOR FURTHER RESEARCH AND ACTION, 20
Organically Grown Movements -- Project-Instigated Movements
Egypt – Case Study 1, 3 pp.
Georgia – Case Study 2, 3 pp.
Tunisia – Case Study 3, 3 pp.
Philippines – Case Study 4, 3 pp.
Uganda – Case Study 5, 3 pp.
Guatemala – Case Study 6, 2 pp.
Turkey – Case Study 7, 3 pp.
India (1) – Case Study, 3 pp.
India (2) – Case Study 9, 2 pp.
Hong Kong – Case Study 10, 4 pp.
Argentina – Case Study 11, 3 pp.
Brazil – Case Study 12, 2 pp.
Colombia – Case Study 13, 5 pp.
United Kingdom – Case Study 14, 5 pp.
Indonesia – Case Study 15, 5 pp.
Bangladesh – Case Study 16, 4 pp.